Q and A with Bay Area District Superintendent Vince Anibale

Pg 3 - Vince Anibale

Earlier this year, our executive director, Rachel Norton, had the chance to interview Bay Area District Superintendent Vince Anibale at a small event. Vince answered questions from Rachel on everything from his personal history with parks to what he sees as the future for our state parks system, and even answered a few guest questions as well.

Rachel Norton: I’ve met many people around the state since becoming Executive Director of the California State Parks Foundation, and one common thread is that everyone has a story about their connection to our parks. So, tell us, what are a couple of your memories of parks and was there someone who encouraged your interest?

Vince Anibale: This is kind of a long-winded story I’ll try to keep it short. As all of you know you go through personal growth in your life, you kind of have self-revelations at certain points, and in 2013 I decided to solo hike the John Muir Trail. I did it in order to raise funds for Sonoma State Historic Park and their junior ranger program. On day seven – I was trying to hike the trail in seven days and I didn’t make it, I did it in nine – and on day seven I was hiking up towards Donohue Pass and I came across this gentleman – and if you’re ever on the John Muir Trail especially by yourself everybody you see, you strike up a conversation say, “where are you going?” type thing. So this gentleman came up to me and says, “Hey, where you’re heading?” And I said Tuolumne Meadows. The guy just started laughing and said, “you’re never gonna make it!” It didn’t click until a couple weeks later, but him doubting me getting to Tuolumne Meadows was probably the biggest motivation I had on my whole trip. I had a messenger that I messaged my wife and I said, “I met the doubter today,” and it motivated me to move faster.

I got home, thought about this guy and I remembered when I was 14-years-old at San Mateo Memorial County Park camping on a boy scout trip and a ranger came, he was nice to us, and I said to my friends, “wouldn’t it be cool to be a ranger when I’m older?” My friends laughed and said, “there’s no way you’re getting a job to become a ranger because those are impossible jobs to get.” From that point on I thought, I’m gonna get a ranger job. I went through high school and college and the whole time I was thinking, I’m gonna apply to be a ranger somewhere.

RN: Moving forward to the present day, what is a day in life for a park superintendent and what’s your favorite aspect of your job?

VA: Variety’s probably my favorite aspect, you get to see a lot of different things. The Bay Area district has 26 parks, 12 of those parks are operated by a partnership of some kind day-to-day operations – those are East Bay Regional Parks, Napa County, Jack London Park Partners, Friends of China Camp, Team Sugarloaf, Marconi Conference Center – so all those different groups we interact with on a daily or weekly basis and I get to go around and talk to all those different groups and talk to different employees. There’s a lot of moving pieces, it can be very political, you have to kinda make snap decisions on things and hope it’s the best. So my day is different every day. I mean here I am at Anchor Brewery that’s kinda weird. It’s different, I like the variety. There’s a lot of moving pieces in trying coordinate all that is fun and challenging.

RN: You’re being too modest, it’s a very challenging job. In general and broad terms, how are our 280 state parks beaches and historic places doing?

VA: That’s a good question. I started in ‘99 with state parks at Big Basin Redwoods and at the time we had a lot of general fund dollars, much more than we do now. General fund obviously has been kind of creeping down and we’re looking at creative revenue streams and partnerships throughout the state to keep things running. I would say overall its favorable looking into the future for our entire parks system compared to the last 5-10 years when the funding was kind of dry, and now we’re getting different funding sources.

I think Director Mangat has done a good job of finding different funding sources overall for the parks, and the department is looking into more creative ways of partnering with different groups whether it be concessions or nonprofits or government entities to try to keep things going

I think overall for the department it’s been a good thing, it’s providing more funding and just more help from volunteers and different groups that are able to support us in many different ways. My outlook for our department is definitely favorable in the next three to five years and I think we’re going to get more funding and more things and more partner support.

RN: CSPF cares deeply about providing access to parks to youth, because we believe our parks offer benefits to them and because our parks need them as future stewards. What are some great initiatives you’ve led or seen at other parks to provide opportunities for youth to enjoy and engage with their parks?

VA: I’m very passionate about trying to get young kids into our state parks. I’ve tried starting junior ranger programs everywhere I’ve worked, and it really helps with getting repeat guests. What I’ve found is most kids that didn’t come with their families want to come back later with their families. One of the most incredible programs I saw was when I worked in Mt. Diablo State Park about 15 years ago. Grant funds paid for kids that had never seen the park before to be bussed from Oakland.

I think just providing transportation, which is such a difficult thing for most disadvantaged folks, just providing transportation to the park is I think half the battle. Once they get there they really usually enjoy what they’re seeing and want to come back. That transportation aspect is really key and just being able to find funds to bus a school into the park is sometimes all we need.

RN: Tell us about the relationship between the department of parks and rec and private organizations like CSPF. Why is private philanthropic support so vital to the work you’re doing?
VA: We have a marketing issue and we always have. We’re getting better at marketing and advertising, but what I found in 2012 when a lot of these parks were on the closure list and we had partners come in and take over some of the day-to-day operations of the parks, is the partners were really good at advertising the park and marketing to the surrounding communities and that brought in a lot more people who wouldn’t have normally visited, providing outreach where state parks hasn’t been able to do it in the past – though we are getting better at it.

In my experience here in the Bay Are District, we wouldn’t be able to operate several of our parks without the partners we have, in particular, CSPF. In 2012 you provided grants two or three years in a row for the Environmental Living Program in Petaluma Adobe State Historic Park, which was on a closure list. CSPF, along with Sonoma Petaluma Parks Association, kept that park open and was able to maintain that program for 4th graders to spend the night. That’s a good example of how if those partnerships didn’t exist, there’d be about 1,500 kids each year that wouldn’t see that park. Maintaining those relationships and that outreach to the communities really helps us.

RN: You get one minute with Governor Brown. What would you ask him for?

VA: If I saw Governor Brown in an elevator or something like that and I’m alone with him? I don’t know if I’d ask him for anything I think, I’d probably thank him and say thank you for supporting California state parks and then talk about my personal situation: I have three kids, I got to see parks when I was a child, and explain the generational aspect of state parks and how we’re trying to save them for future generations. I wouldn’t ask for – well, I’d probably ask him for stable funding. I’d be like, c’mon man, you know? C’mon man!

GUEST: What’s your favorite state park?

VA: It’s one that I haven’t worked at, I’ll tell you that – all the parks that you end up working at you’re like, oh man I’m so sick of this park. Henry W. Coe is my favorite state park. I go backpacking there twice a year, I go with my brother and my son and we have a great time. Henry W. Coe is about 80,000+ acres in the San Jose foothills, east of Morgan Hill, north of Gilroy, an awesome place if you want to backpack. It’s dispersed camping once you get a couple miles out, its really the gem of the bay area for backpacking cos you don’t need a reservation, you can go anytime you want. The secret’s out.

GUEST: Any possibility of dogs on leash at any of the state parks?

VA: I can only imagine if we ended up having dogs on trails the amount of support we’d probably get, but it is written into law that dogs are not allowed on state park trails, so that’s a hurdle that would have to be overcome. There are certain areas designated in those parks, there’s usually one or two trails that I find. Even at Henry W. Coe, there’s a trail that goes from the campground to the visitors center that you take your dog on. In Big Basin there’s a trail that goes from the visitor’s center to the campground, there’s usually a fire ring designated [dog-friendly]. That’s a hurdle I cannot accomplish or jump over, but I can imagine certain trails may be designated in the future at some point, but I can’t do that myself.

GUEST: We’ve traveled to many states where admission to parks are free, it’s considered general support, the parks are well cared for. Do you have a sense of what we can do as citizens in California to move the needle in that direction? So we can move away from fees as barriers to access?

VA: It’s a good question. Definitely state parks could do better with stable funding and making access free for everyone. The biggest impact you could make is by writing your legislators and governor and putting it on their radar that that’s what you want. If you write to state parks there’s not much we can do about it, it’s gonna have to come from a real high level. I think that’s the most impactful way, talking with your high-level government appointees and elected officials.

RN: I have just one last quick question, on the funding issue, do you want to say anything about the state parks bond and different maintenance and what that could potentially do for your parks?

VA: So, obviously I can’t say much as a government employee. We do have a large, long list of deferred maintenance needs especially in the Bay Area, we have state historic parks with crumbling infrastructure. The backlog is incredible, if we were able to get funding that would be incredible to maybe fix some of those problems.

RN: More is always better, right? Thank you so much for joining us, Vince.

State Budget Paves Way for Solar Energy at Malakoff Diggins

After a four-year effort, CSPF and state park supporters throughout California are celebrating that the current state budget includes the necessary funding to install a cost-effective, clean solar energy system at Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park.

malakoff diggins craig vanzante

Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park (c) Craig VanZante

This project is critical to the future of Malakoff Diggins SHP because this remote state park does not have access to conventional electricity, and currently relies on an expensive diesel generator to power the lighting and security systems that protect an estimated 100,000 historical artifacts.  The Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) has stated that it spends $70,000 annually to run the generator alone. PG&E has estimated the cost to bring conventional electricity to the park at over $2 million.

By bringing solar to Malakoff Diggins, the park will not only rely on a cleaner energy source, but will significantly reduce its operating costs and allow money currently spent on running the generator to be used for other purposes.

In 2008, Malakoff Diggins was one of 48 state parks identified for closure in the first of many park closure proposals due to state budget cuts. Some state park administrators felt Malakoff Diggins didn’t produce enough revenue to offset its operating cost, a major portion of which was the cost of running the diesel generator.

lf ghs march

Grizzly Hill School students march to protest closure of Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park

Between 2008 and 2013, CSPF led statewide advocacy efforts to stop the closure of state parks – organizing rallies, petition drives, press conferences and visits with policymakers. In April of 2008, CSPF organized a march for state park supporters from Sutter’s Fort SHP to the State Capitol. Students from Grizzly Hill School joined the march, helping raise awareness of the importance of Malakoff Diggins to their community.

In 2012, CSPF provided $25,000 in critical funding to the South Yuba River Citizens League (SYRCL) to help the organization enter into a donor agreement with the State of California in order to keep the park open.

“This generous stop-gap funding from the California State Parks Foundation gives us the breathing room to work with local State Parks staff to develop a long-term solution to save the historic Malakoff Diggins,” said Caleb Dardick, Executive Director of the South Yuba River Citizens League, in 2012, after his organization received a CSPF Park Partnership Grant to help keep Malakoff Diggins State Historic Park open. “With this welcome reprieve, we will focus on long-term solutions such as getting a comprehensive solar power system installed at the park, which could save $60,000 to $80,000 per year in diesel fuel costs for generators and benefit the environment as well.”

Although the doors of the state park stayed open, efforts to bring solar to Malakoff Diggins kept going. In 2013, CSPF was pleased to award another $4,000 to SYRCL for the evaluation of solar power options at the park.

After thorough analysis and evaluation, the cost to bring solar power to Malakoff Diggins was estimated at $700,000, including preliminary plans, working drawings, and construction. Earlier this summer the funding proposal was adopted by the Legislature and signed by Governor Brown. Solar energy is coming to Malakoff!

Learn More and Plan Your Visit

Malakoff Diggins SHP is located in the historic town of North Bloomfield, 26 miles northeast of Nevada City, and encompasses 3,200 acres in the northern Sierra Nevada foothills region.

The park was created in 1965 by concerned citizens to preserve the largest hydraulic gold mining operation in the United States, an operation that devastated the area from the mid-1800s on. Visitors to Malakoff Diggins can view the hydraulic mining pit, which showcases the appalling scale of environmental impacts caused by hydraulic mining throughout northern California. Huge cliffs have been carved into the mountains by the gold mining technique of washing away entire mountains to find the precious metal. The destruction resulted in the first environmental protection law handed down by the federal court in 1884 to control further mining efforts.

Malakoff Diggins SHP offers over 20 miles of recreational trails. Swimming and fishing are also available, and a popular Kids Fishing Derby is held each May. Miner’s Cabins and Campgrounds are very popular.

This park is a very popular destination for students learning about California Gold Rush history and offers teachers an overnight Environmental Living Program where students learn period crafts and experience living in the Gold Rush era.

Learn more at DPR’s Malakoff Diggins web page and Friends of North Bloomfield and Malakoff Diggins.